Knowing the difference between effectiveness and efficiency is not always clear in the workplace. Often the two words are used interchangeably. So if we are to explore effectiveness in more detail then it is important that we draw a clear definition that allows us to differentiate between the two. Consider the following question:

Which is more important; doing the right thing, or doing things right?
Take a few moments to think about this. Doing things right is an important part of getting your job done. But doing the right thing might be the most important aspect of what you do.  So when it comes to working in organisations it is more important to be doing the right things than it is to be doing things right.

Let me explain...

Effectiveness comes from doing the right things
whilst
Efficiency means doing things right

Efficiency and effectiveness are both important concepts, and organisations that want to be the best that they can want to achieve well in both areas, but at the end of the day it is the effectiveness that wins out. That is to say, it is more important to be effective than efficient. Sure, efficiency is important. You can and undoubtedly should aim do things right all day long, but if you’re not doing the right things then you may well be wasting your time. Because if you are not doing the right things then you are not aligning your own performance with the business needs, what you do will be ineffective and if you are ineffective, it doesn’t matter how efficient you are.
So being focused on doing the right things is an important first step in being effectiveness.

Simple!

PS: This concept of doing the right thing versus doing things right is also used by Peter Drucker to explain the difference between leaders and managers. Leaders, he argues, should be doing the right thing, whilst managers should be doing things right. See also http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/48016.The_Essential_Drucker
 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Off and running...

Image
My Dad gave me a calendar yesterday. It was one of those desktop ones on which every date there is a new ‘thought for the day’. I’m not really sure of the theme, Dad had used a few days of it himself so the cover was long gone. In general I suppose the quotes, most which are attributed to 'great thinkers' throughout history,would be considered as ‘life tips’. Not my dear old Dad's cup of tea at all, hence the handover. He knows me well. It's off to a good start. The entry for the 12 th April reads: “ We never do anything well until we cease to think about the manner of doing it ” and is attributed to William Hazlitt. I googled Hazlitt to assess his credentials for such a statement. A contemporary of Wordsworth and Coleridge, Hazlitt was a philosopher, journalist and essayist in early 19 th century Britain. According to The Hazlitt Society he became the first major drama critic in English, the first major art critic, and one of the most gifted literary and
Read more

Business Continuity as a form of OD

Image
Is Business Continuity a form of OD? It's a bit early in the week to wire up  "The Cogitator" and consider the world of OD through my own particular lens, but as I am delivering a Business Continuity decision making exercise this week I wanted to stop for a moment to consider the connection between Business Continuity and Organisational development. Does BC = OD? Simulations provide a key opportunity for learning and offer an opportunity to analyse decision making in a safe environment and are an excellent tapestry for personal development, yet few relatively few organisations choose to run decision making exercises for this purpose. In the field of L&D overall simulations tend to be niche areas, and not always regarded as the first option. I find this rather thought provoking, especially when the role of simulations is so well established in some other areas of organisations. Take for instance the field of Business Continuity. Business Continui
Read more

Critical Incident Timeline. Are you prepared?

Image
Understanding how a critical incident develops can help us to know what to expect when an incident happens for real. So far this year there have already been a number of high profile critical incidents affecting organisations. Most recently the escalation of the Algerian hostage crisis has been a major news story. Last week, the first ever helicopter crash in London sparked a critical incident that, whilst more local in impact, was headline news and impacted organisations caught up in the maelstrom of unfolding events.   Studying how the news unfolded in this stand alone tragic accident can help us to assess the realism of the timelines in our own continuity exercises and critical incident simulations. In this blog post I present a timeline for the helicopter incident and briefly discuss critical incidents from an organisational impact perspective. Building the timeline What I have done below is to build a timeline of the helicopter crash incident, as best as I have been able
Read more